This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Constitutional Law
First Amendment
Freedom of Expression

Dianna Dariano, John Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School District, et al.

Published: Dec. 3, 2011 | Result Date: Nov. 8, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:2010-cv-02745 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert J. Muise
(American Freedom Law Center)

William J. Becker Jr.
(Freedom X)


Defendant

Alyson S. Cabrera
(Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani)

Mark S. Posard
(Gordon & Rees LLP)


Facts

On Cinco de Mayo in 2010, several students of Live Oak High School in Morgan Hill wore American themed clothing to school, including depictions of the American flag. School administrators told the students that they should take off or turn their clothing inside out, and told students that they could be suspended if they declined to do so.

The administrators contended they believed that the student plaintiffs' safety was at risk, based on a nearly physical altercation that occurred on Cinco de Mayo the previous year, and on information they obtained from students on May 5, 2010. Ultimately, two of the students left school voluntarily and another student's parents removed that student. None of the students were suspended.

Later, the students sued the school district and school administrators, claiming violations of their First Amendment, Equal Protection Clause, and Due Process Clause rights.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that before administrators can suppress student speech in light of a perceived threat of violence against those students, an actual disruption must have occurred.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that administrators could suppress student speech in light of perceived threats based on a reasonable forecast.

Result

The court granted defendants' summary judgment.


#82546

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390