This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
California Labor Code
Suitable Seating

Nykeya Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy Inc.

Published: Jan. 26, 2013 | Result Date: May 31, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:09-cv-02051 Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

James F. Clapp
(Clapp & Lauinger LLP)

Zachariah P. Dostart
(Dostart Hannink LLP)

James T. Hannink
(Dostart Hannink LLP)

J. Daniel Holsenback

Marita M. Lauinger
(Clapp & Lauinger LLP)

Matthew Righetti
(Righetti Glugoski PC)


Defendant

Geoffrey G. Moss
(Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP)

Michael D. Weil
(Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP)

Timothy J. Long
(Greenberg Traurig LLP)


Facts

Nykeya Kilby, a retail clerk who worked for CVS Pharmacy Inc., filed a class action on behalf of herself and other similarly situated, against CVS, alleging that CVS was required to provide suitable seating according to the California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act of 2004, and failed to do so.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that CVS failed to follow state labor lab by failing to provide retail clerks with suitable seating. The employees argued that if the nature of the employees' work reasonably permits the use of seats, then seats are required.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
CVS argued that the Private Attorney General Act does not apply to CVS's retail clerks. Defendant argued that the majority of Plaintiffs' work involved standing and it was expected that employees stand while performing their duties. CVS asserted that retail clerks had to stock shelves, help customers with locating items, sweep, and retrieve items, all of which required standing.

Result

The Court granted summary judgment to CVS.


#82602

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390