This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Misrepresentation
Business 'Coaching' Scheme

Federal Trade Commission v. Ivy Capital Inc., et al.

Published: Feb. 2, 2013 | Result Date: Dec. 20, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:11-cv-00283-JCM -GWF Settlement –  $130,000,000

Court

USDC Nevada


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Daniel O. Hanks
(Federal Trade Commission)

Dotan Weinman

Robert G. Schoshinski

Emily C. Burton
(Federal Trade Commission)

Blaine T. Welsh
(Office of the U.S. Attorney, District of Nevada)


Defendant

Casey G. Perkins

Chad R. Fears

Jeffrey L. Willis


Facts

The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against Ivy Capital Inc. for allegedly running a massive business "coaching" scheme that took more than $100 million from consumers trying to run their own online businesses. The FTC alleged that Ivy Capital misrepresented the earning potential of the program, misrepresented their goods and services, and failed to fully disclose and honor their refund policy in violation of federal law. Most consumers paid between $2,000 and $20,000 for the program and related products and services, but received very little in return. They also found it difficult to obtain a refund.

Result

Ivy Capital agreed to settle the matter, which would impose a $130 million judgment.


#82642

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390