Vera Dragicevich v. Chase Home Finance LLC and Does 1 through 1000, et al.
Published: Jun. 28, 2014 | Result Date: Aug. 1, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 2:12-cv-08192-ABC-MAN Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Rachel A. Nelson
(Nelson Law Office APC)
Keith A. Robinson
(Law Office of Keith A. Robinson)
Defendant
Jeffrey N. Williams
(Wargo & French LLP)
Facts
Vera Dragicevich sued Chase Home Finance LLC, seeking declaratory relief and quiet title.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Chase was Dragicevich's mortgage servicer. In 2010, Dragicevich proposed a loan modification. Chase responded with an offer for a "Trial Period Plan," where Dragicevich could make monthly payments of $2,095.17 while Chase evaluated the proposed loan modification.
Dragicevich argued that Chase's response amounted to an acceptance of her loan modification plan, and that Chase later breached this agreement by foreclosing on her home.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Chase argued that its response was not an acceptance of Dragicevich's proposed loan modification, and that it never agreed to permanently modify her loan.
Result
The court granted summary judgment for Chase.
Other Information
FILING DATE: Sept. 21, 2012.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390