This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Constructive Fraud

Ronald Eckerman and Carol J. Eckerman, personally and on behalf of the Carol J. Eckerman Trust dated November 10, 1999 v. Sll Investments Inc., Patricia E. Monat, Monat Wealth Management, Monat Financial Services and National Planning Holdings Inc.

Published: Jul. 4, 2014 | Result Date: Jun. 13, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 12-04043 Arbitration –  Expungement

Court

FINRA


Attorneys

Claimant

Bradd L. Milove
(Miller & Milove)


Respondent

Heidi VonderHeide


Facts

Ronald Eckerman and Carol Eckerman, personally, and on behalf of the Carol J. Eckerman Trust dated November 10, 1999 filed a complaint against Sll Investments Inc., Patricia Monat, Monat Wealth Management, Monat Financial Services and National Planning Holdings Inc., in connection with the recommendation and purchase of Direct INvest-246 Omni Way sponsored TIC investment as part of an IRC Section 1031 Exchange. Respondents, with the exception of National, filed a counter-claim against claimants.

Contentions

CLAIMANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Claimants contended that respondents' recommendation to invest in the subject investment was inappropriate for their investment objectives. They asserted causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud, fraud and deceit, unfair sales practices, breach of contract, negligence and negligent misrepresentation, and declaratory relief.

RESPONDENT/CROSS-CLAIMANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Respondents denied claimants' allegations, and asserted various affirmative defenses. They asserted causes of action for breach of contract, express indemnity, and equitable indemnity. All causes of action related to claimants' allegations that they breached their duties or made material representations in executing the investment.

Damages

Claimants requested $1,272,348 in compensatory damages and unspecified amounts for exemplary/punitive damages, interest, attorney fees and costs, and other relief. Respondents mirrored claimants' requested relief.

Result

The FINRA Panel lacked jurisdiction over National, which was not a FINRA Member Firm. On or about Feb. 6, 2014, the parties reached a settlement in principle. Monat subsequently filed a motion for expungement. Claimants concurred in Monat's request for expungement. As such, the Panel recommended the expungement of Monat's records. In light of the parties' settlement, terms of which were not disclosed, the Panel dismissed claimants' claims and respondents' counterclaims, and denied the requested relief.

Other Information

ARBITRATORS: Bruce Brown, Alain Frecon and Evonne A. Hurst


#82929

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390