Steve Escamilla v. Phillips Kitchen & Bath Reglazing and Does 1 through 20
Published: May 14, 2016 | Result Date: Apr. 22, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 30-2014-00752628-CU-PO-CJC Settlement – $10,000
Court
Orange Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
David H. Solo
(Law Office of David H Solo)
Defendant
Matthew L. Marshall
(Morris Polich & Purdy LLP)
Facts
Plaintiff Steve Escamilla sued defendant Phillips Kitchen & Bath Reglazing for negligence and products liability.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that Phillips Kitchen and Bath Reglazing was hired to reglaze a bathroom at plaintiff's place of employment, which was also where plaintiff lived. He claimed that Phillips used a reglazing product that contained chemicals that caused him respiratory injuries. Plaintiff alleged that Phillips knew that adequate ventilation was required but unavailable and that it failed to warn plaintiff about the dangerous nature of the product being used. He also contended that Doe defendants Resource Training Connection and Resurfacing.com as suppliers of the reglazing product were also liable.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Phillips cross-complained against Resurfacing.com for indemnification, apportionment of fault, and declaratory relief. Resurfacing.com also cross-complained against Phillips for total equitable indemnity, comparative indemnity and apportionment of fault, and declaratory relief. It argued that did not in any manner cause or contribute to plaintiff's injuries and was entitled to be indemnified by Phillips for any money recovered by plaintiff against Resurfacing.com.
Result
Plaintiff settled with Resurfacing.com for $10,000.
Other Information
According to plaintiff, there was also a confidential six-figure settlement with another defendant. FILING DATE: Oct. 23, 2014.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390