This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Negligent Supervision
Sexual Assault

Jane Doe v. Roe Bus Company

Published: Dec. 5, 2009 | Result Date: May 15, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Settlement –  $1,000,000

Court

Riverside Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Andrew I. Roth

Diane Catran Roth

David M. Ring M.D.
(Taylor & Ring)


Defendant

Raymond F. Dolen
(Orrock, Popka, Tucker & Dolen)


Experts

Plaintiff

Steven N. Sparta
(medical)

Augustine C. Zemba
(technical)

Defendant

William Stolz
(medical)

Ron Kinney
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiff, a 9-year-old special education student, rode defendant's bus to and from school from January to May 2002 while she was in the fifth grade. The bus transported only special education students and plaintiff was usually the only girl on the bus. The plaintiff alleged that the other boys sexually assaulted her on the bus numerous times during those five months.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the bus company was negligent in its supervision of students on the bus and that the bus driver was improperly trained. The plaintiff claimed that had the bus driver paid any attention to what was taking place behind him as he drove, he would have seen the sexual misconduct occurring.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant claimed that its bus driver was properly trained and that he never saw any improper sexual misconduct by any of the special education students who rode the bus. The plaintiff never complained about anything occurring on the bus to the driver or anyone else. Once the allegations were first made in May 2002, the company took all appropriate measures to investigate and put an end to such behavior.

Specials in Evidence

$20,000; $150,000 (disputed)

Injuries

The plaintiff claimed emotional distress.

Result

The case settled for $1 million on the date the case was sent out for jury trial.


#84165

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390