This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Trip and Fall

Angelique Vandhana v. Archstone Smith

Published: Dec. 19, 2009 | Result Date: Nov. 20, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIVRS802515 Bench Verdict –  Defense

Court

San Bernardino Superior, Rancho Cucamonga


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael S. Kelly


Defendant

Kevin J. Gramling
(Klinedinst PC)


Experts

Plaintiff

James Doti
(medical)

Jay William Preston
(technical)

Defendant

Kenneth A. Solomon
(technical)

Arthur Kreitenberg M.D.
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff Angelique Vandhana was a tenant at an apartment community owned and managed by defendant Archstone Smith in Ontario. The plaintiff tripped and fell over a crack in the parking lot. The crack was 135 inches long, 1.5 inches wide, and with a maximum elevation difference of half an inch.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the crack was a dangerous condition that should have been repaired by the defendant.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that the crack in the parking lot was a trivial defect and that it did not owe plaintiff a duty to repair or warn about the crack. The defendant also contended that it was not negligent and that the crack did not cause the plaintiff's fall.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $400,000 pre-litigation and served a C.C.P. Section 998 for $99,500 nine months before trial. The defendant made a C.C.P. Section 998 offer of $20,001 nine months before trial. The defendant did not make any other offers.

Specials in Evidence

$104,000 $8,700 none none

Damages

The plaintiff asked the jury to award over $600,000 in past non-economic damages and over $90,000 in future non-economic damages.

Injuries

The plaintiff ruptured her left Achilles tendon. The following day, the plaintiff ruptured her right Achilles tendon. The plaintiff had surgery on both Achilles tendons and missed approximately six months of work.

Result

The judge granted the defendant's post-trial directed verdict motion finding the crack was a trivial defect.

Other Information

The defendant's motion for summary judgment on the trivial defect issue was denied. The defendant's directed verdict motion during trial was denied. The jury could not reach a verdict on whether the defendant was negligent and the judge declared a mistrial. The defendant is seeking costs and fees. FILING DATE: March 14, 2008.


#84233

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390