Sharon Henning v. US Bank
Published: Dec. 19, 2009 | Result Date: Nov. 12, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: SC096472 Settlement – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Santa Monica
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Kevin J. Gramling
(Klinedinst PC)
Jennifer S. Vicente
(Klinedinst PC)
Experts
Plaintiff
Jason Hymes
(medical)
Defendant
John R. Brault M.S.
(technical)
Arthur Kreitenberg M.D.
(medical)
Facts
Plaintiff Sharon Henning was attempting to complete a banking transaction at a remote drive-up teller machine at a US Bank branch in Santa Monica. The canister got stuck somewhere between the remote teller machine and the teller inside the bank. After the canister returned to the remote teller, the plaintiff put her left hand around the canister to remove the canister from the remote teller machine. The plaintiff alleged the plexi-glass window started to close while she had her left hand on the canister. The plaintiff claimed that she had to reach across her body with her right hand to free her left hand from the remote teller machine and injured her shoulder, neck and upper back.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that US Bank was negligent because its employee caused the plexi glass window to close on plaintiff's hand.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
US Bank contended that it was not negligent. The remote teller machine was installed in early 2004 and there had not been any similar incidents prior to plaintiff's incident. US Bank was not on notice of problems with the remote teller machine.
Furthermore, experts concluded that the remote teller machine was designed such that the plexi-glass window would retract once it met resistance and the expert could not reconstruct the incident as plaintiff alleged.
US Bank also maintained that plaintiff's incident did not cause her injuries and that the medical conditions that plaintiff claimed were similar to medical conditions that plaintiff had before the incident.
Settlement Discussions
The plaintiff demanded $90,000 with an indication the case might settle for $75,000. The plaintiff served a C.C.P. Section 998 for $25,000 in August 2009. US Bank did not make any offers.
Damages
The plaintiff claimed the incident caused her to incur almost $90,000 in medical specials for treatment to her neck, shoulder and back.
Injuries
The plaintiff suffered nerve damage and soft tissue injuries to her neck, left shoulder and upper back. The plaintiff had numerous trigger point and epidural injections over a six-month period following the incident.
Result
During voir dire, the plaintiff dismissed the case in exchange for a waiver of appeal rights and costs.
Other Information
US Bank's demurrer to the product liability cause of action was sustained. US Bank's motion for summary judgment was denied. MEDIATOR: Ralph O. Williams. FILING DATE: Dec. 20, 2007.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390