This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Harold Pemstein v. Dana Sherman, Martin Pemstein, Phillip McMeans

Published: Mar. 27, 2010 | Result Date: Dec. 14, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 802823 Bench Decision –  $696,218

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven R. Young
(Law Offices of Steven R. Young)


Defendant

David E. Rosenbaum


Experts

Plaintiff

Jaime Holmes
(technical)

Defendant

David Hahn
(technical)

Facts

Two brothers, Harold Pemstein and Martin Pemstein owned a business (Pemma Corporation) operated from six buildings that the brothers owned in a separate partnership (HMS). In October 1998, Harold Pemstein resigned as Pemma's president. Martin Pemstein, in concert with his friend Philip McMeans and his uncle Dana Sherman, Pemma's attorney, excluded Harold not only from Pemma, but also from HMS. Harold Pemstein then sued to dissolve Pemma and HMS.

The first trial occurred in front of Judge David Brickner and lasted four months. Dana Sherman, who had served as Harold Pemstein's personal attorney, served as counsel for Martin Pemstein during the trials over Harold Pemstein's repeated objection. Four appeals resulted, and the Court of Appeals vacated Judge Brickner's orders denying the dissolution of Pemma, and remanded the case to the trial court for retrial.

In 2005 Peter Polos presided over a non-jury phase of the case. Polos disqualified Sherman as counsel. Polos, after evidence on the equitable claims found that Harold Pemstein dissociated from HMS and that it was dissolved effective January 1999. While conducting an accounting of HMS and Pemma, Martin Pemstein filed four more appeals, and filed a bankruptcy petition for Pemma and another for HMS.

In 2009, after dismissal of the appeals, and completion of the two bankruptcy proceedings, Harold Pemstein moved the court to try the remaining issue of an accounting between the Pemsteins concerning HMS and Harold Pemstein's charges that Martin Pemstein failed to properly account for rents and profits owing to Harold Pemstein. Judge Polos conducted a hearing and found this issue unresolved in the bankruptcy proceedings, and set the matter for trial. Judge Polos conducted the trial without a jury.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Harold Pemstein contended that he resigned from the presidency after long brewing hostilities erupted. He claimed that Martin Pemstein, in concert with his friend Philip McMeans and his uncle Dana Sherman, Pemma's attorney, excluded Harold not only from Pemma, but also from HMS.

Result

On Dec. 14, 2009, Judge Polos found Martin Pemstein breached his duty of care to Harold Pemstein in the collection of rent for HMS, and awarded Harold Pemstein damages. The judgment became final on March 15, 2010.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 6, 1999.


#84317

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390