This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Misdiagnosis

Kenny Charles, by and through his guardian Nicholas Charles v. Mark Pesche, D.O., and Alyssa Watanabe, M.D.

Published: Feb. 4, 2012 | Result Date: Oct. 27, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 271255 SPC Verdict –  Defense

Court

Kern Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Donald A. Garrard


Defendant

Dennis R. Thelen
(LeBeau Thelen LLP)

John A. Jurich


Experts

Plaintiff

Paul Choi
(medical)

Kendall S. Wagner M.D.
(medical)

Defendant

Matthew Lotysch M.D.
(medical)

Richard A. Johnson
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff Kenny Charles went to the Tehachapi office of his family practitioner, Mark Pesche, with complaints of pain in the lower left extremity. Pesche diagnosed him with trochanteric tendinitis. Charles returned the next month and received an MRI. He was diagnosed with slipped capital femoral epiphysis, or a growth plate abnormality. Kenny sued for misdiagnosis.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that defendants had failed to timely diagnose his condition, violating the standard of care and committing medical malpractice. Charles believed that Pesche should have immediately referred him to an orthopedic surgeon.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that they had not violated the standard of care and that plaintiff's parents should have returned him to Pesche's office if his condition had not improved, as they had been instructed.

Damages

Plaintiff sought $600,000.

Injuries

After the correct diagnosis, Charles underwent an unsuccessful surgery to stabilize the hip. He underwent multiple admissions and surgical procedures over an 18 month span. He claimed that the surgeries had resulted in a left leg discrepancy of 1.5 inches and a permanent limp/gait alteration. He also claimed residual constant pain in his leg and hip.

Result

The jury ruled for the defense.

Deliberation

2.5 hours

Poll

11-1

Length

nine days


#84366

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390