This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
False Advertising
Flu Remedy Claims

Leonidas Jovel, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Boiron Inc., Boiron USA Inc., Laboratories Boiron

Published: May 10, 2014 | Result Date: Feb. 27, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:11-cv-10803-SVW-SH Bench Decision –  Class Certification Denied

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stewart Weltman
(Siprut PC)

Elaine A. Ryan
(Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint PC)

Patricia N. Syverson
(Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint PC)

Jeff S. Westerman
(Westerman Law Corp.)

Lindsey M. Gomez-Gray

Manfred P. Muecke
(Manfred APC)

Jordanna G. Thigpen
(Thigpen Legal PC)

Keith J. Verrier


Defendant

Valerie Goo

Christina G. Sarchio
(Dechert LLP)

Haven G. Ward


Facts

Leonidas Jovel filed a class action against Boiron Inc., based on allegations of misleading labeling.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Boiron manufactures and distributes Oscillococcinum and Children's Oscillococcinum, a homeopathic over-the-counter drug. The products' labels stated that they temporarily relieve flu-like symptoms, and that their active ingredients worked to reduce the duration and severity of those symptoms.

Jovel argued that the labeling was misleading because Oscillo's ingredients did not actually work, and even if Oscillo's active ingredient was effective, it was so diluted in Oscillo that it would lose any efficacy. Jovel sought class certification, seeking to represent a class based on Oscillo's misleading product labels.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Boiron opposed class certification, arguing that that clinical evidence supported the label claims of the drugs' efficacy, and that neither Jovel nor counsel were adequate to represent the class. Boiron also requested an award of sanctions against Jovel and his counsel on the grounds of vexatious litigation for filing a frivolous class action claim.

Result

The court denied Jovel's motion for class certification. It also denied Boiron's motion for sanctions.


#84646

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390