This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Breach of Promissory Note
Employment Law

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes v. Victor B. Elkind

Published: Apr. 5, 2014 | Result Date: Mar. 14, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 11-03976 Arbitration –  $355,782

Court

FINRA


Attorneys

Claimant

Mauricio S. Beugelmans
(Schiff Hardin LLP)

Daren Luma


Respondent

Robert H. Barnhill

Erwin J. Shustak
(Shustak, Reynolds & Partners PC)


Facts

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC filed for arbitration against Victor Elkind.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Morgan Stanley asserted a cause of action for breach of promissory notes. Elkind executed the notes while Morgan Stanley employed him.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Elkind denied the allegations, and filed a counterclaim. In his counterclaim, Elkind asserted causes of action for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraudulent inducement, intentional misrepresentation, intentional omission, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, negligent omission, tortious interference, constructive fraud, constructive termination, promissory estoppel, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. The causes of action related to Elkind's employment with Morgan Stanley.

Damages

Morgan Stanley sought $17,750 and $169,167, the outstanding amounts on the two promissory notes.

Result

The arbitration panel found in favor of Morgan Stanley, and denied all of Elkind's claims. It awarded Morgan Stanley $19,261 on the first promissory note, and $186,291 on the second promissory note. The panel also ordered Elkind to pay $140,000 in attorney fees, and $10,229.97 in costs.

Other Information

ARBITRATORS: Lester G. Stiel, Michael D. Briggs and Alan Joseph Goldstein


#84812

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390