This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Business Law
Unfair Business Practices
Unlawful, Unfair or Fraudulent Business Act

Jose Luis Ramirez, Maria Esther Ramirez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., and Does 1 to 10, inclusive

Published: Dec. 3, 2016 | Result Date: Nov. 8, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 30-2016-00871148-CU-OR-CJC Demurrer –  Defense

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Peter L. Nisson
(Nisson & Nisson)

Anthony P. Cara
(CDLG PC)


Defendant

Shanon J. McGinnis
(Wargo & French LLP)

Jeffrey N. Williams
(Wargo & French LLP)

Scott R. Laes


Facts

Jose Ramirez and Maria Ramirez sued JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. in relation to the foreclosure of their home.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs filed this action seeking to prevent the foreclosure of their property following their default. Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing allegedly failed to provide them with a single point of contact to coordinate the loan modification review process. Select Portfolio Servicing also allegedly failed to provide plaintiffs with a written acknowledgement of receipt of their modification documents. Plaintiffs asserted causes of action for violation of California's Homeowners Bill of Rights, negligence, and unfair business practices.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Select Portfolio Servicing demurred, challenging the sufficiency of plaintiffs' allegations. Plaintiffs allegedly failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiffs allegedly filed this action to delay any possible non-judicial foreclosure of their property following plaintiffs' default on their loan.

Result

The court sustained Select Portfolio Servicing's demurrer with leave to amend. Among other things, the court found that plaintiffs' lacked standing to assert the claims because there was no impending foreclosure of their property.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 23, 2016.


#84903

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390