Jose Luis Ramirez, Maria Esther Ramirez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Published: Dec. 3, 2016 | Result Date: Nov. 8, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 30-2016-00871148-CU-OR-CJC Demurrer – Defense
Court
Orange Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Peter L. Nisson
(Nisson & Nisson)
Anthony P. Cara
(CDLG PC)
Defendant
Shanon J. McGinnis
(Wargo & French LLP)
Jeffrey N. Williams
(Wargo & French LLP)
Facts
Jose Ramirez and Maria Ramirez sued JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. in relation to the foreclosure of their home.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs filed this action seeking to prevent the foreclosure of their property following their default. Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing allegedly failed to provide them with a single point of contact to coordinate the loan modification review process. Select Portfolio Servicing also allegedly failed to provide plaintiffs with a written acknowledgement of receipt of their modification documents. Plaintiffs asserted causes of action for violation of California's Homeowners Bill of Rights, negligence, and unfair business practices.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Select Portfolio Servicing demurred, challenging the sufficiency of plaintiffs' allegations. Plaintiffs allegedly failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiffs allegedly filed this action to delay any possible non-judicial foreclosure of their property following plaintiffs' default on their loan.
Result
The court sustained Select Portfolio Servicing's demurrer with leave to amend. Among other things, the court found that plaintiffs' lacked standing to assert the claims because there was no impending foreclosure of their property.
Other Information
FILING DATE: Aug. 23, 2016.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390