This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Construction
Construction Defects
Water Intrusion

Katherine Grill on Behalf of the Katherine Grill Revocable Trust, et al. v. Meritage Homes of California Inc., et al.

Published: Dec. 31, 2016 | Result Date: May 26, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV 11-13 Verdict –  Mixed Verdict

Court

Yolo Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David A. Frenznick
(Wilke Fleury Hoffelt Gould & Birney LLP)

Robert T. Haney
(Parker PLLC)


Defendant

Johanna M. Berta
(Severson & Werson APC)

Sheila M. Totorp
(Clausen Miller PC)

J. Michael Cochrane
(Greve Clifford Wengel & Paras LLP)

David A. Ericksen
(Collins Collins LLP)

Ian R. Feldman
(Clausen Miller PC)


Experts

Plaintiff

William C. Thomas III
(technical)

Charles E. Cassani
(technical)

John Payne
(technical)

Al Saroyan
(technical)

Anurag Jain
(technical)

George Thomas
(technical)

Kim Worl
(technical)

Defendant

Kelly Cobeen
(technical)

Larry Keil
(technical)

James A. Mahaney
(technical)

Anthony Montosa
(technical)

Ray Choy-Marshall
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff homeowners sued structural engineer Harris & Sloan and stucco contractor Toliver Plastering Inc. for alleged defects in the structure and on stucco surfaces of several single family homes in West Sacramento.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended there were stucco defects and engineering deficiencies as to 41 single family homes. Plaintiff homeowners alleged that the structural engineer and/or stucco subcontractor fell below their respective standards of care, which in turn caused various defects including stucco cracks, water intrusion, and development of mold.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants disputed plaintiffs' allegations.

Settlement Discussions

Prior to trial, plaintiffs demanded between $500,000 and $1.5 million from Toliver Plastering, the stucco subcontractor. According to defense, plaintiffs also demanded $12 million from Harris & Sloan.

Damages

Plaintiffs claimed repairs to purported defects in the structural design for wind and cede issues, the application of the stucco system, and remediation of mold. Plaintiffs also alleged loss of use and diminution in value of properties. According to defense, plaintiffs sought $5.6 million.

Result

The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff and awarded $128,525 against the stucco contractor. The jury rendered a complete defense verdict for the structural engineer.

Other Information

Plaintiff filed a post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was denied and a memorandum of costs in support, which was denied. Toliver filed a post-trial motion to vacate and enter different judgment, and a memorandum of costs in support, which was also denied. Plaintiff's motion for new trial was denied. According to defense, all parties filed a motion to tax costs, which were withdrawn, following post-trial settlement, or denied. Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal that was withdrawn as moot following a post-trial settlement. Plaintiffs had previously settled with all other defendants, including Meritage, prior to trial.

Deliberation

three days

Length

16 days


#84978

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390