Elaine Sutton, et al. v. Vanida Lee, et al.
Published: May 16, 2009 | Result Date: Apr. 14, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 07K21065 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Cheryl C. Turner
(Law Office of Cheryl Turner)
Defendant
Michael G. Hogan
(Raffalow Rhoads & Bretoi)
Facts
On Nov. 12, 2005, at 2 p.m., defendant Vanida Lee, 36, was driving a 1991 Toyota Camry in the fast lane of the eastbound Santa Monica freeway, near Arlington Avenue in Los Angeles. The defendant struck the rear of a 2000 Nissan Sentra, being operated by plaintiff Elaine Sutton, a 72-year-old caregiver, and occupied by Sutton's granddaughter, Se-Aira Benson, 13. The court dismissed Benson's case prior to trial.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
In response to defendant's claim that plaintiff changed lanes directly in front of her, plaintiff contended that she was always in the fast lane before the accident. Plaintiff had stopped for traffic when she was rear-ended by defendant. The plaintiff maintained she observed the defendant in her rearview mirror just before the accident talking on a cellular phone.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that plaintiff caused the accident when plaintiff passed her on the right and then changed lanes directly in front of her, cutting off her stopping distance and then abruptly stopped for traffic. The defendant claimed that she applied her brakes, but was unable to avoid striking plaintiff's vehicle. The defendant argued the accident was minor, resulting in a "soft touch" impact.
Specials in Evidence
$4,425 The plaintiff claimed she earned $150 per day as a caregiver. She missed 90 days from work and sought loss of earnings of $13,500. She was paid cash and presented no documentation at trial to support her loss of earnings claim.
Damages
The plaintiff's property damage claim settled for $3,284. There was no damage to defendant's vehicle.
Injuries
The plaintiff claimed soft tissue injuries to her neck, shoulders, upper back, lower back and wrists. She received 34 chiropractic treatments. At trial, the plaintiff claimed her pain was resolved.
Result
The jury rendered a defense verdict.
Other Information
The defendant was awarded costs. The case report was created from information provided solely by defense counsel. Plaintiff's counsel has disputed the case and has stated that the case is being appealed. INSURER: Mercury Insurance Group for defendant.
Deliberation
15 minutes
Poll
12-0
Length
two days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390