This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trademark Infringement
Lanham Act

Harajuku Lovers LLC v. Forever 21 Inc., Forever 21 Retail Inc.

Published: May 16, 2009 | Result Date: Dec. 31, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:07-cv-03881-ODW-SS Settlement –  Injunction

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Barry E. Mallen

Jill M. Pietrini


Defendant

Bruce B. Brunda

Stephen Z. Vegh


Facts

In 2005, Gwen Stefani began operating Harajuku Lovers, LLC, which sold fashion accessories and apparel. On March 6, 2007, Harajuku Lovers sent a certified cease-and-desist letter to Forever 21 to cease use of designs and trademarks allegedly owned by Harajuku Lovers. After Forever 21 failed to cease use of the designs, Harajuku Lovers sued Forever 21 Inc., and Forever 21 Retail Inc. for trademark infringement.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Harajuku Lovers claimed that Forever 21's designs confused consumers due to their similarity to Harajuku Lovers' designs and that Forever 21 engaged in unfair competition.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Forever 21 contended that it did not commit trademark infringement and that Harajuku Lovers' trademarks were invalid.

Damages

Harajuku Lovers sought $77,000 in damages as well as punitive damages, attorney fees, costs and a permanent injunction.

Result

The parties' settlement enjoined Forever 21 from using the plaintiff's trademarks.


#85808

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390