This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Estate
Fraud
Intentional Torts

Charles S. Strauch, Nan Y. Strauch v. Mitchell Chait, Marci Chait, John Gerard, Trustee of the SLC Revocable Living Trust, Joan Crespi, Trustee of the SLC Revocable Living Trust

Published: May 23, 2009 | Result Date: Mar. 5, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 07CC06669 Bench Decision –  Liability only

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Daniel M. Livingston
(Payne & Fears LLP)


Defendant

J. Scott Humphrey
(J. Scott Humphrey APC)


Experts

Plaintiff

Kurt Stake
(technical)

Janet Panichi
(technical)

Facts

In 2003, Mitchell and Marci Chait purchased a home from Charles and Nan Strauch. Soon after, the Chaits sued the Strauches based on allegations that the home contained defects. The Strauches prevailed in the lawsuit and was granted attorney fees and costs. The Strauches recorded a lien of the judgment against the home. However, the Chaits claimed that they no longer owned the home, and that the home was transferred to Joan Crespi and John Gerard. As a result, the Strauches sued the Chaits, Gerard, and Crespi on a creditor's claim for fraudulent conveyance.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs claimed that the transfer of the home to Crespi and Gerard was fraudulent because it occurred to avoid payment to the Strauches.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense asserted that the house could not be taken as payment because it no longer belonged to them. Further, the parties entered into a contract to sell the house prior to judgment in the underlying case.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought the transfer of property set aside, attorney fees, and punitive damages.

Result

The court found in favor of the plaintiffs on all counts and set aside the transfer of property. The property must be turned over to the sheriff of Orange County for sale. While the court initially found a right to punitive damages, no punitive damages were awarded.


#85833

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390