This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Declaratory Relief
Violation of Mobile Home Residency Law

De Anza Cove Homeowners Association Inc., et al. v. City of San Diego, et al.

Published: Feb. 21, 2015 | Result Date: Oct. 16, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: GIC821191 Settlement –  $22,000,000

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Karen R. Frostrom
(Thorsnes Bartolotta McGuire LLP)

Timothy J. Tatro

Vincent J. Bartolotta Jr.
(Thorsnes Bartolotta McGuire LLP)

Peter A. Zamoyski
(Goode Hemme APC)


Defendant

William M. Rathbone
(Gordon Rees Scully Mansukani)

Donald R. Worley

John E. Riley

Timothy K Branson
(Gordon & Rees)


Facts

Plaintiff filed a lawsuit the City of San Diego relating to the closure of a mobile home park on public park land.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that in 2003, the City of San Diego attempted to end the use of certain land as a mobile home park without providing the residents of the mobile home park any relocation assistance or other compensation.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The city argued that the residents of the mobile home park were not entitled to relocation assistance because in 1982 they were given a 20 year reprieve for continued residential use of the land, which was not a proper public use pursuant to certain trust provisions that the lands were subject to. The city further argued that the residents all signed long-term leases and agreed to vacate the property in 2003 without compensation.

Result

After the court held that the city must pay the residents relocation assistance, a bench trial was held and the court then entered an amended judgment on Oct. 16, 2014. Pursuant to the judgment, the city was required to pay various monies amounting to approximately $22 million in mitigation for closing the park. The judgment included, in part, payments to reimburse mobile homeowners the cost to relocate the mobile home and an appurtenance allowance, or if relocating the mobile home was not practical, a 48-month rent differential and a moving expenses allowance. The payment by the city also included temporary lodging payments. The city was also enjoined from a number of actions, including closing the park without fully complying with the orders of the court and the terms of the judgment.

Other Information

After entry of judgment, the city publicly offered to accept the judgment if plaintiff waived its right to appeal. FILING DATE: Nov. 18, 2003.


#86124

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390