This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Slander
Forfeiture

Son T. Nguyen, Hanh T. Nguyen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Published: Nov. 29, 2014 | Result Date: Jan. 16, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:12-cv-04183-PSG Summary Judgment –  Defense

Facts

Son Nguyen and Hanh Nguyen filed a lawsuit against J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that in 2005 they took out a $1,175,000 loan from Washington Mutual Bank, to purchase a home and that such loan was secured by a deed of trust on their property. Plaintiffs further alleged that Washington Mutual sold the beneficial interest in the Deed of Trust in 2005. Plaintiffs also alleged that after Washington Mutual ceased conducting business in 2008, Chase purchased certain assets of Washington Mutual. Plaintiff argued that in 2009, in order to foreclose upon plaintiffs' home, JP Morgan recorded a notice of default under the deed of trust and also recorded an assignment of deed of trust. Plaintiffs contended a wrongful foreclosure and violation of Unfair Competition Law because the deed of trust on their property was not included in the assets assumed by Chase and, therefore, Chase could not enforce an interest in plaintiffs' property.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Chase argued that Washington Mutual transferred its interest in plaintiffs' loan to Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as trustee, but retained the right to service the loan. Chase further argued that it acquired Washington Mutual's servicing rights in the loan from the FDIC and thereafter, properly initiated foreclosure proceedings following plaintiffs' default.

Result

The court granted Chase's motion for summary judgment. The court held that the genuine issues of material fact raised by plaintiffs stemmed from the securitization process of their loan and that plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the securitization process.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 9, 2012.


#86249

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390