This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumers Legal Remedies Act
Unfair Competition

Serena Kwan, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Sanmedica International, LLC, Sierra Research Group LLC

Published: Nov. 22, 2014 | Result Date: Oct. 30, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:14-cv-03287-MEJ Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Elaine A. Ryan
(Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint PC)

Patricia N. Syverson
(Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint PC)

Stewart M. Weltman
(Siprut PC)

Manfred P. Muecke
(Manfred APC)

Lindsey M. Gomez


Defendant

Jeremy N. Lateiner
(Goodwin Procter LLP)

Steven W. Garff
(Price Parkinson & Kerr PLLC)

Mark J. Williams

John P. Snow

Rollin B. Chippey II

Christopher B. Sullivan

Jason M. Kerr


Facts

Serena Kwan filed a class action against SanMedica International LLC and Sierra Research Group LLC.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that defendants manufactured, sold, or otherwise made available, SeroVital, an over-the-counter supplement that was marketed to boost human growth hormone, or HGH. Plaintiff alleged that defendants marketed and labeled the product, claiming that it provided a 682 percent increase in HGH levels. Defendants also claimed that the product was clinically tested, and that "peak growth hormone levels" were associated with "youthful skin integrity, lean musculature, elevated energy production, and adipose tissue distribution." Plaintiff alleged that she bought the product based on defendants' representations, and later sued defendants, alleging defendants' claims were unsubstantiated. Plaintiff asserted causes of action for violation of California's Unfair Competition Law and violation of California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint because plaintiff failed to demonstrate that its claims regarding the product were false, and plaintiff failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Defendant also argued that plaintiff's claims were based entirely upon substantiation allegations, which there existed no private right of action.

Result

The court agreed to dismiss Kwan's complaint, but with leave to amend.

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 21, 2014.


#86288

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390