This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
ERISA
Retaliation

William Bastien v. ABF Freight Systems Inc., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive

Published: Nov. 22, 2014 | Result Date: Feb. 28, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:12-cv-02755-TLN-KJN Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael Peart


Defendant

Karl G. Nelson

Matthew S. Kahn
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP)


Facts

William Bastien filed a complaint against ABF Freight Systems Inc.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that he was hired by defendant as a driver in and, while he was employed, he received notification that he was entitled to receive pension benefits while continuing to work, after he reached the age of 65. Plaintiff further alleged that after he elected to start collecting his pension while still working, defendant removed him from defendant's seniority list and effectively terminated his employment because he was collecting such pension benefits. Plaintiff argued that defendant's policy of removal from the seniority list violated the Employment Retirement Income Security Act.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that plaintiff's pension plan did not create any right to remain on defendant's seniority list while receiving pension benefits. Defendant further argued that it was contractually required by a collective bargaining agreement to remove plaintiff from its seniority list after he elected to receive retirement benefits.

Result

After dismissing the state law claims, the court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's ERISA claim, which was the only remaining cause of action. The court held, in part, that the loss of seniority did not violate plaintiff's rights under ERISA.


#86322

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390