This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Fraud
Investment Advice

Susan Emadi v. Donald & Company Securities, Inc., Steven Varasteh, National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.

Published: Aug. 21, 1999 | Result Date: Apr. 15, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 9802005 Arbitration –  $91,000

Court

Case Not Filed


Attorneys

Claimant

Douglas J. Rovens

Neda Yassaei


Respondent

Thomas J. Rittenburg


Experts

Claimant

Alan Rockler
(technical)

Respondent

John D. Maine
(technical)

Facts

In 1996, claimant Susan Emadi, a widowed mother who fled Iran following the Iranian revolution, opened a brokerage account at respondent Donald & Co. The claimant supported herself with income from homemade costume jewelry sales and royalties from a book she had written. The claimant had previously lost $70,000 from other brokerage accounts, and had obtained, but failed to collect, an arbitration award for the loss. The claimant opened the account with Donald & Company based on representations by respondent Steven Varasteh, a registered representative of Donald & Co. and her distant cousin. Varasteh represented that he had an incredible investment opportunity for a software company called Mustang Software. Over the next four months, the respondents sold 14,500 shares of highly speculative Mustang stock to the claimant. The stock price fell dramatically and the claimant could not make margin calls. As a result, the claimant lost $59,000. The claimant brought this action against the respondents, Donald & Co. and Steven Varasteh, based on fraud and breach of fiduciary duty (unsuitable investments) theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The claimant made a settlement demand for $100,000. The respondents made a joint settlement offer of $40,000.

Other Information

The award was reached approximately eleven months after the case was filed. The arbitration was held on April 6, 1999 before Joseph Winter, Robert Granas and Thomas Doyle of the National Association of Securities Dealers. POST TRIAL MOTIONS: The claimant has filed a petition to confirm the arbitration award.

Poll

3-0

Length

two days (arbitration)


#86819

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390