This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
False Arrest
Negligent Hiring and Supervision

Philip Markowitz v. City of Los Angeles, City of Pasadena, D. Duran, LAPD Officer Magallon, LAPD Sgt. Torres, M. Dahlstein, PPD Sgt. Delgado, Sgt. Rojas, Sgt. Ventura, Christian, Tucker, Sgt. Art Chute, and LAPD Officers Does 1 to 15

Published: Oct. 22, 2016 | Result Date: Mar. 9, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC379354 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jeffrey A. Cohen
(Law Office of Jeffrey A Cohen)


Defendant

Denise C. Zimmerman
(Office of the City Attorney)


Facts

Philip Markowitz sued the City of Los Angeles, the City of Pasadena, and various named Los Angeles Police Dept. officers and sergeants, including D. Duran, Magallon, Torres, M. Dahlstein, Delgado, Rojas, Ventura, Christian, Tucker, and Art Chute, as well as LAPD Doe Officers, in connection with an incident that allegedly occurred on Jan. 15, 2007.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff was at his residence when LAPD officers from the Hollywood division took him into custody and turned him over to the Pasadena Police Dept. Plaintiff claimed that he previously dated a woman who lived in Pasadena and that this woman had called the Pasadena Police Dept. to report him. However, no findings were made and the charges against plaintiff were ultimately dropped. Plaintiff filed this instant action against the named defendants, municipalities and doe defendants, alleging that their actions constituted false arrest and unlawful seizure.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed exigent circumstances existed permitting the arrest. Defendants also denied any use of force and that plaintiff essentially allowed the officers into his property.

Damages

Markowitz sought damages for the officers' intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Injuries

Markowitz allegedly suffered from nightmares following the incident and had to undergo counseling.

Result

Many of the named defendants were ultimately let out of the case, including the City of Pasadena and the matter continued only against the City of Los Angeles and seven previously unnamed LAPD officers. The jury found that exigent circumstances existed and rendered a verdict in favor of the defense.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Oct. 19, 2007.


#86981

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390