This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trademark Infringement
False Association and Designation of Origin

2die4Kourt, Kimsaprincess Inc., Khlomoney Inc., Kourtney Kardashian, Kim Kardashian West, Khloe Kardashian v. Hillair Capital Management LLC, Hillair Capital Investments LP, Haven Beauty Inc., Neal Kaufman, Sean McAvoy, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Oct. 29, 2016 | Result Date: Aug. 23, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 8:16-cv-01304-JVS-DFM Bench Decision –  Preliminary Injunction

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jonathan P. Steinsapir
(Kinsella, Weitzman, Iser, Kump & Aldisert LLP)

Michael J. Kump
(Kinsella, Weitzman, Iser, Kump & Aldisert LLP)

Gregory P. Korn
(Kinsella, Holley, Iser, Kump & Steinsapir LLP)


Defendant

Michelle K. Millard
(Willenken LLP)

Steven G. Edwards

Gregory A. Fayer
(Fayer Gipson LLP)

Tyler J. King
(Fayer Gipson LLP)


Facts

Plaintiffs 2die4Kourt, Kimsaprincess Inc., and Khlomoney Inc., are "loan-out" companies for plaintiffs Kourtney Kardashian, Kim Kardashian West, and Khloe Kardashian, respectively. The Kardashian plaintiffs are sisters known for their reality television series. Plaintiffs filed an infringement lawsuit against Hillair Capital Management LLC, Hillair Capital Investments LP, Haven Beauty Inc., Neal Kaufman, and Sean McAvoy in relation to a license agreement.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The parties initially entered into a contract, under which defendants obtained a license to use plaintiff's images for their line of cosmetics. However, defendants allegedly failed to pay royalties under the exclusive licensing agreement, but continued to use plaintiffs' images even after the exclusive license agreement was terminated, thereby prompting plaintiffs to file this instant lawsuit. Defendants allegedly used plaintiffs' trademarks without authorization to design, manufacture, and distribute cosmetic products, causing irreparable harm.

Plaintiffs asserted causes of action for federal trademark infringement, false association and designation of origin, violation of the right of publicity under California law, and California common law trademark infringement. Plaintiffs moved for an injunction.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed that the agreement was improperly terminated, thereby excusing their obligation to pay royalties. Defendants denied breaching any obligation under the licensing agreement.

Result

The court granted the Kardashian plaintiffs an injunction, enjoining defendants from using the Kardashians' trademarks.

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 13, 2016.


#87027

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390