This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Fourth Amendment
Interference with Familial Relations

Lisa Castillo, B.U., a minor, and L.V., a minor, by and through their Guardian ad Litem, Lisa Castillo v. County of Los Angeles, Rihana Acklin, Erasmo Aguilar, Norma Ward, Virginia Espinoza, Christina Alfaro, and Does 1 through 9

Published: Nov. 12, 2016 | Result Date: Aug. 23, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:14-cv-07702-BRO-E Settlement –  $999,999

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Luke Jackson

Vincent W. Davis
(Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis and Associates)


Defendant

Diana Ratcliff
(Peterson Bradford Burkwitz Attorneys at Law)

Lauren M. Black

Avi A. Burkwitz
(Peterson, Bradford, Burkwitz, Gregorio, Burkwitz & Su )


Facts

Lisa Castillo and minors B.U. and L.V., sued the County of Los Angeles and Child Services Workers Rihana Acklin, Erasmo Aguilar, Norma Ward, Virginia Espinoza, and Christina Alfaro, in connection with an alleged incident that occurred on Oct. 3, 2012.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
On Oct. 3, 2012, plaintiff bathed her youngest child, a three-month-old infant, put him to bed and went to have dinner with her family. She later returned to find the baby unresponsive. They called 911 and the baby was rushed to the hospital where he died five days later. Social workers went to the hospital and spoke with plaintiff's other minor children and thereafter took them into custody. Plaintiff claimed there was no sign of any abuse or neglect of her baby, but the social workers nevertheless took her children away. Plaintiff was not returned custody of her children for almost ten months. Plaintiffs sued defendants, for allegedly taking plaintiff's children without a warrant. Defendants also allegedly forced her to sign off on a safety plan resulting in her children's lengthy detention. Plaintiffs asserted causes of action for several counts for violation of civil rights under Section 1983 and a Monell claim.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The parties reached a $999,999 settlement.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Oct. 4, 2012.


#87117

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390