This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Compensations, Benefits
Wage and Hour, Class Action

John Conley, Jeffrey Brewer, Coy Wiggins, Hall Hackney, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

Published: Oct. 17, 2009 | Result Date: Jul. 30, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 310938 Settlement –  $17,250,000

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Heather M. Conger

Sarah Beard

Jonathan H. Siegel
(Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani)

Daria Dimitroff


Defendant

Thomas M. McInerney
(Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart PC)

Gary T. Lafayette
(Lafayette & Kumagai LLP)


Facts

John Conley and Coy Wiggins, senior new business representatives, Jeffrey Brewer, an electric distribution engineer, and Hall Hackney, a gas distribution engineer, were employed by Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E). The plaintiffs brought suit on behalf of a class of approximately 700 individuals similarly situated who had worked for PG&E between March 1996 and May 2009. Plaintiffs alleged that PG&E violated the California Labor Code and the Business & Professions Code. All class members were either senior new business representatives, industrial power engineers, electric distribution engineers, or gas distribution engineers.

The case was stayed in 2001 and 2002 while PG&E was in bankruptcy proceedings. In 2004, the court denied class certification and granted summary judgment in favor of PG&E. The plaintiffs appealed and, on remand, three subclasses were certified.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs claimed that they were improperly classified under the California Labor Code as employees exempt from overtime wages. They claimed they were in fact entitled to be paid at rates 1.5 times their regular rate for hours worked beyond 40 hours per week.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
PG&E claimed that the employees were properly classified as exempt and that no overtime violations had occurred under state law.

Damages

On behalf of the class, the plaintiffs sought damages for back wages for unpaid overtime hours, overtime pay going forward, waiting time penalties, interest and attorneys' fees.

Result

Through mediation, the parties settled for $17,250,000. Pursuant to the settlement, PG&E will reclassify the senior new business representatives as hourly and start paying them overtime. PG&E also agreed not to reduce their base pay.


#87664

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390