This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Construction Contract
Failure to Pay

Simich Construction Company Inc. v. City of Monrovia

Published: Oct. 17, 2009 | Result Date: Jun. 25, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC382985 Verdict –  $82,787

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Martha Eager
(Monteleone & McCrory LLP)

Patrick J. Duffy III


Defendant

Robert J. Gokoo
(Law Offices of Robert J. Gokoo)


Facts

On Jan. 16, 2007, Simich Construction Company Inc. entered into a written contract with the city of Monrovia for a public improvement project known as "2006-2007 Water Main Replacement Program, Project No. C-2980" (Project No. C-2980). Per the agreement, Simich would provide construction, labor, and materials for Project No. C-2980. Ultimately, Simich sued the city for payment associated with particular work performed, including the removal of asphalt pavement in order to excavate the water main trenches, the replacement of the asphalt after installation of eight-inch ductile iron pipe, the removal of sidewalk in the areas where trenches were needed for the installation of copper piping, and the replacement of the sidewalk after installation.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Simich claimed that it performed all that was required of it under the contract but Monrovia failed to pay them. Simich claimed that the relevant unpaid portions of the project were necessary and integral to the entire project.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Monrovia claimed that the work in dispute was "contingent' and/or 'additive", to be completed only as needed at the direction of the project engineer. Monrovia claimed that Simich misunderstood the bid documents and failed to obtain clarification of what those documents contained. Monrovia also claimed that Simich was seeking more money because it discovered that it had bid too low.

Damages

Simich claimed that it was owed $141,978 under the contract.

Result

The jury awarded plaintiff $82,787.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Dec. 27, 2007.


#87684

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390