This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Subrogation
Negligent Window Repair, Products Liability

United Services Automobile Association v. Pella Window Sales Company, et al.

Published: Nov. 21, 2009 | Result Date: Feb. 11, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: FG05206318 Verdict –  $61,857 for plaintiff USAA; $362,165 for Bielen intervenors

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephen N. Cole


Defendant

Joseph C. Wright

Robert S. McLay

Maria S. Quintero
(Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP)


Facts

In 2002, intervenors Theodore and Denise Bielen sustained water damage as a result of leaks on their property in Berkeley. Plaintiff United Services Automobile Associations (USAA) insured the intervenors. USAA paid some funds on the claim and sued for subrogation against defendants Pella Window and Door Company of California Inc., Pella Corporation, and J.E. Higgins Lumber Company (collectively Pella) for reimbursement for money that plaintiff paid to intervenors.

Intervenors paid additional funds to repair the problem. Intervenors joined the complaint and also sued USAA claiming breach of insurance contract and bad faith.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTION: The plaintiff and intervenors claimed the defendants were at fault for faulty windows and installation, causing water damage to the insured property. The plaintiff also argued that it was the intervenors who breached their contract by failing to sign the proof of loss forms.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTION: The insurer defendant claimed they do not owe any additional money.

INTERVENORS' CONTENTIONS:
As against USAA, the Bielens claimed that the additional losses were covered under their homeowners policy. As against Pella, the Bielens claimed that if there was no coverage, defendants were liable for faulty replacement and repair of windows.

Result

A verdict was returned for the plaintiff USAA for $61,857 against Pella. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Bielen intervenors for $362,125 against Pella. The jury found for USAA against intervenors on the breach of insurance contract/bad faith claim.

Other Information

FILING DATE: April 4, 2005.


#87875

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390