This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Product Liability
Product Recall

Tricia Zubrick, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. and Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC

Published: May 11, 2013 | Result Date: Aug. 27, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1:2011-cv-08543 Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Illinois


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Julie D. Miller

Jeffrey A. Leon

Jamie E. Weiss


Defendant

Pamela J. Yates
(Arnold & Porter )

Jeffrey M. Wagner


Facts

Tricia Zubrick bought three packages of Tri-Previfem birth control pills, which were manufactured by Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc., and Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC. On Sept. 15, 2011, the manufacturers issued a nationwide voluntary recall of the pills, including those Zubrick bought. Zubrick's doctor informed her about the recall a month later, and she received a letter from the pharmacy where she obtained her prescription. Later, she filed an action, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, against the manufacturers to recover damages for ingesting the ineffective pills.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, claiming she relied on defendants' failure to disclose the defect in buying the pills, which caused inadequate contraceptive protection. She also alleged that the pills were not reasonably fit for its intended purpose, and that defendants breached the implied warranty of merchantability.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that Zubrick lacked standing because she did not buy actually defective birth control pills, and the pills were properly packaged. Defendants also argued that their press release was made publicly available and directed consumers to use back up protection.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion to dismiss.


#87896

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390