Barbara Ferren v. Valley Village South Apartments, Seltzer-Doren Management Company and City of Los Angeles
Published: May 11, 2013 | Result Date: Dec. 19, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: LC085961 Verdict – $524,197
Court
L.A. Superior Van Nuys
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Mark D. Apelian
(Bryman & Apelian)
Defendant
Carmen A. Trutanich
(Tucker Ellis LLP)
David A. Belofsky
(Belofsky Law Group PC)
Experts
Plaintiff
Stephen Kay
(medical)
Facts
Barbara Ferren was walking on a sidewalk at night when she tripped and fell due to a lift in the sidewalk. She used her right arm in an attempt to break her fall and to protect her face, causing her to break her upper arm. She sued Valley Village South Apartments and Seltzer-Doren Management Co., the respective owner and manager of the property adjacent to the accident, as well as the City of Los Angeles for failing to repair the dangerous condition.
Ferren obtained a settlement with the City. Hence, the matter proceeded to trial against Valley Village and Seltzer-Doren only.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that the sidewalk was raised due to the roots of a tree located on the defendants' private property. Plaintiff further contended that the defendants had a duty to properly maintain and inspect the subject property, and that they failed to timely repair the dangerous condition created by the root.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that the subject tree root did not cause the lift. Defendants also contended that the City was responsible for maintaining the sidewalk, and that plaintiff failed to exercise due care while walking on it.
Damages
Ferren sought $10,000 in past loss of earnings; $17,038 for past medical costs; and $103,000 for future medical costs.
Injuries
Ferren fractured her right, non-dominant arm, and underwent a closed reduction of the fracture in the emergency room.
Result
The jury found the defendants negligent and awarded Ferren almost half a million in damages, including $17,038 for past medical cost; $96,250 for future medical costs; $10,000 each for past and future lost earnings; $60,000 for past pain and suffering; and $300,000 for future pain and suffering. On Oct. 19, 2011, plaintiff filed a CCP 998 that was for less than the verdict, according to the plaintiff. As such, the defendant will be responsible for expert's fees, costs and interest.
Deliberation
30 minutes
Poll
12-0
Length
five days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390