Rutherford H. Dawson v. Ford Motor Company
Published: Mar. 17, 2007 | Result Date: Nov. 27, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BC328110 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Experts
Plaintiff
Ernest Manuel
(technical)
Andy Zighelboim
(technical)
Facts
Plaintiff Rutherford Dawson, a former Ford minority dealer, claimed that he entered into a contract with defendant Ford Motor Co. Under the contract, defendant allegedly agreed to appoint plaintiff as a Ford Division dealer without any screening, on the condition that he presented an operable buy/sell contract with a selling dealer. According to plaintiff, defendant breached their agreement when it failed to accept his application as a dealer. Plaintiff further claimed that at the time defendant rejected his application, he had already agreed to purchase the dealership's assets from Lithia Concord Ford VW. Moreover, plaintiff opined that his application should not have been rejected, as he was a qualified candidate for the job.
According to plaintiff, the rejection of his application resulted in the tortious interference of his buy/sell contract with Lithia. He also claimed promissory fraud.
Defendant argued that it never had a contract with plaintiff. Further, it asserted that plaintiff's application was rejected because he failed to meet the criteria for appointment as a dealer.
Damages
Plaintiff sought $29 million. This amount included lost profits and loss of the appreciation of value in the leasehold improvements of the dealership.
Result
Judgment was for defendant.
Other Information
Plaintiff contended that the trial court erred in instructing the jury and in improperly limiting the evidence in could consider, and will appeal.
Deliberation
four days
Poll
9-3
Length
eight weeks
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390