Facts

Claimant was seen at the Kaiser Dermatology Clinic for an epidermoid cyst. Claimant stated that she specifically asked to have the cyst removed. Claimant alleged that she was seen by a Nurse Practitioner who refused to remove the cyst, but instead injected it with a steroid. Claimant stated she did not give informed consent and was not given an indication why this injection was being given. The site of injection became infected, leading to surgical removal, residual scarring and pain.

CLAIMANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The injection was not indicated. Lack of informed consent, lack of a follow-up plan, and lack of indications for using an injection.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Steroid injection is a viable option for treating an epidermal pidermoid cyst. The site became infected due to claimant's manipulation of the area.

Result

Binding arbitration ruling in favor of respondent.

Other Information

Arbitration occurred with the Hon. Robert J. Polis of Judicate West.

Length

three days