This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
CEQA
Air Quality

The 765 Market Street Residential Owners Association; Friends of Yerba Buena; Paul Sedway; Ron Wornick; Matthew Schoenberg; Joe Fang; Margaret Collins v. The City and County of San Francisco; San Francisco Board of Supervisors; City and County of San Francisco Department of Public Works; Office of the City and County Surveyor; Bruce Storrs; in his

Published: Mar. 12, 2016 | Result Date: Feb. 9, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CGC-14-540094 and CPF-14-513433 Settlement –  Equitable Settlement

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jill Siegel Dodd

Peter Sandmann

Thomas N. Lippe


Respondent

Susan Cleveland-Knowles

James B. Morales
(Successor Agency to San Francisco Redevelopment)

Daniel M. Engler

Robb W. Kapla
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)

Andrew B. Sabey

Daniel K. Kolta


Facts

765 Market Street Residential Owners Association and several others filed two related complaints against the City and County of San Francisco, in connection with it's approval of a high-rise residential project in the Yerba Buena neighborhood known as the 706 Mission Street-Mexican Museum Project.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendant's approval of the project allegedly violated CEQA and the Public Resources Code, the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance, the San Francisco Conservation District Ordinance, and the state Planning and Zoning Law.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The City and County of San Francisco demurred, claiming plaintiffs failed to show any CEQA or Public Resources Code violations. Defendants also claimed that the action was time-barred and that plaintiffs' requested declaratory relief was unavailable where no actual controversy existed.

Result

The parties reached an agreement, in which the City and County of San Francisco agreed to consider the installation of a crosswalk at Third St. and Stevenson St., revising signal timing and offsets on Third St., and relocating a pedestrian signal on that street. Real Party in Interest, 706 Mission Street Co., committed to donating $100,000 to offset the costs of funding any improvements approved by the City and County of San Francisco.


#88865

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390