This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Environmental Contamination
Improper Disposal

San Mateo County, et al. v. Metrigen Inc., et al.

Published: Nov. 5, 2011 | Result Date: Aug. 1, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIV 501131 Settlement –  $250,946

Court

San Mateo Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephen M. Wagstaffe
(Office of the San Mateo County District Attorney)


Defendant

Karl Morthole


Facts

Nathan Hamilton and Thomas Brennan were executive officers for Metrigen Inc., a biotech company based in San Mateo County.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The civil law enforcement action, filed in San Mateo County Superior Court on December 2, 2010, alleged that the defendants were closing their laboratory at 849 Mitten Road, Suite 101 in Burlingame in Dec. 2008.

During the closure process, on Dec. 28, 2008, Defendant Brennan paid a residential moving company that was not licensed or authorized to transport hazardous waste a few hundred dollars to dispose of several sealed, unlabeled cardboard boxes. The boxes collectively contained 257 bottles, at least 115 of which contained hazardous waste, acute hazardous waste, and/or extremely hazardous waste.

Multiple bottles displayed labels noting that the contents were water reactive (including violently reactive), air reactive, carcinogenic, harmful to the reproductive system, mutagenic, light sensitive, and/or incompatible with acids. The labels on the bottles were concealed by the sealed boxes. The boxes themselves did not display any warnings regarding the dangerous nature of the contents, such as "flammable," "explosive," "toxic," "do not expose to air," and/or "do not expose to water." The defendants did not provide the moving company any specific instructions on how to dispose of the boxes

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Hamilton and Brennan contended they made a mistake and had no intention of breaking the law.

Result

The San Mateo County District Attorney's Office obtained a stipulated judgment that included (1) civil penalties and cost recover totaling $250,946.00 and (2) a prohibition against Defendant Brennan ever again working in any capacity that involves the transportation, storage, and/or disposal of a substance that, if disposed of, would be hazardous waste.


#89345

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390