This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Constitutional Law
Police Misconduct
Strip Search; 42 U.S.C. § 1983

John Smith, Kirby Bradshaw, Spencer Lucas, et al. v. City of Oakland, a municipal corporation; Wayne Tucker, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Oakland; Mayer, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Oakland, et al.

Published: Nov. 12, 2011 | Result Date: Aug. 4, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:07-cv-04179-MHP Bench Decision –  $245,000

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John L. Burris
(Law Offices of John L. Burris)

Michael J. Haddad
(Haddad & Sherwin LLP)

Julia Sherwin
(Haddad & Sherwin LLP)

Benjamin Nisenbaum
(Law Offices of John L. Burris)


Defendant

Todd A. Boley

Arlene M. Rosen


Facts

In 2005, Kirby Bradshaw and Spencer Lucas were pulled over by City of Oakland Police Officers Ingo Mayer and D'Vour Thurston on a busy street across from a restaurant and convenience store. Plaintiffs were forced to stand naked, with their pants and underwear down, in the street while they were strip searched. The two were naked and in plain sight of children walking to school and where a crowd gathered around the scene during that busy morning. They were forced to stand naked on the sidewalk for five to seven minutes. The two sued the city for civil rights violations concerning the police department's strip-search policies.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that the officers had no probable cause nor reasonable suspicion to stop them, and no legal basis to strip search them in public.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied strip searching these plaintiffs.

Injuries

Plaintiffs were humiliated when they were forced to stand naked while being strip searched in front of a busy street.

Result

U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel found that the officers had no probable cause or reasonable suspicion for stopping plaintiffs and that the plaintiffs were unlawfully strip-searched. Judge Patel ordered the city to pay the men more than $205,000. Punitive damages have yet to be determined. The plaintiffs are also entitled to statutory attorney fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The Judge determined that plaintiffs had not committed any traffic violation or any other violation of law. Further, that the officers had not observed any illegal conduct and had no reasonable suspicion for believing that any of the occupants were on parole. Bradshaw and Lucas were only two of several other individuals who filed a complaint against the city and the department over its strip search policies. In 2008, Judge Patel struck down policies related to strip-searches as unconstitutional. More recently, cases of three other men were dismissed, while 39 other remained. On Nov. 3, 2011, the Judge awarded punitive damages in the amount of $25,000 to plaintiff Lucas and $15,000 to plaintiff Bradshaw.

Other Information

On March 20, 2012, the Oakland City Council voted to pay $832,639 to plaintiffs' attorneys John Burris and Michael Haddad.


#89358

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390