This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Bad Faith
Recovery

Peerless Insurance Company, Golden Eagle Insurance Company v. David Du Tran and Thuyen Thi Tran, individually and doing business as LA Chinatown Mall

Published: Sep. 10, 2011 | Result Date: Jan. 14, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 30-2009-00332119 Bench Decision –  $4,343,420

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Richard P. Edwards

Ellen E. Hunter


Defendant

Jack L. Huang


Facts

Defendants David Du Tran and Thuyen Thi Tran owned a shopping mall and were insured under a general liability policy issued by plaintiffs Peerless Insurance Company and Golden Eagle Insurance Company. Defendants' employee was killed while working as a janitor at the shopping mall. Defendants did not carry workers' compensation on decedent, contending that he was an independent contractor. Decedents' survivors sued defendants. Plaintiffs defended and settled the wrongful death action, then pursued this recovery action against the defendants.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs contended that the decedent was the employee of defendants, and not an independent contractor, under all of the criteria set forth by the California Supreme Court in S.G. Borello & Sons Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 48 Cal.3d 341 (1989). Therefore the general liability policy did not cover the defendants' liability arising from the decedent's accident pursuant to the employers' liability exclusion.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that the decedent was an independent contractor, not an employee, and therefore defendants were covered.

Result

Summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs for $4,343,420.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Sept. 3, 2009.


#89513

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390