German Velasquez v. Wesley Phipatanakul M.D., Loma Linda University Medical Center, Suzy Sedrak M.D., and West Covina Medical Group
Published: Aug. 11, 2012 | Result Date: Apr. 27, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: KC054706 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Pomona
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Dennis K. Ames
(La Follette, Johnson, DeHaas, Fesler & Ames)
Michael D. Reid
(LaFollette, Johnson, De Haas, Fesler & Ames APC)
Experts
Plaintiff
Irwin L. Bliss M.D.
(medical)
D. Preston Flanigan
(medical)
Defendant
John Cerlanek
(medical)
Kendall S. Wagner M.D.
(medical)
Facts
On Sept. 2, 2007, German Velasquez sustained scapula and left femur fractures, and a dislocated left ankle due to a motor vehicle accident. Wesley Phipatanakul, an orthopedic surgeon, performed open reduction surgery on Velasquez, who also suffered from diabetes. For post-operative treatment, Velasquez visited Phipatanakul and his family practitioner. Because the wound of his ankle developed gangrene, on Oct. 20, 2007, Velasquez underwent a below-the-knee amputation of his left leg. He sued Phipatanakul, Loma Linda University Medical Center, and his family practitioner, alleging medical malpractice. Subsequently, Loma Linda, and his family practitioner were dismissed from the lawsuit.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that Phipatanakul should have referred him to a vascular surgeon who would have examined Plaintiff's prior femoropopliteal bypass surgery. Plaintiff claimed that another femoropopliteal surgery would have saved Plaintiff from amputation.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that he acted within the standard of care, and that he gave warnings about a possible amputation based on Plaintiff's uncontrolled diabetes. Defendant argued that clinical data did not show that referring playoff to vascular surgery was needed because he had good blood profusion, and nevertheless, a new surgery would not have increased blood flow.
Damages
Plaintiff sought $250,000 in general damages.
Injuries
Plaintiff suffered below-the-knee leg amputation and necrosis.
Result
The jury found in favor of the defense, concluding that there was no causation regarding damages.
Deliberation
two days
Poll
9-3 (negligence), 11-1 (no causation)
Length
one month
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390