Sean Kensinger v. Paul Craft, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the California Highway Patrol, and Jeffrey Goodwin, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the California Highway Patrol
Published: Aug. 25, 2012 | Result Date: Jun. 29, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:11-cv-00885 WHA Verdict – Defense
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Amy W. Lo
(Office of the Attorney General)
Harry T. Gower III
(Office of the Attorney General)
Experts
Plaintiff
David Pingitore
(medical)
Defendant
Kevin D. Harrington
(medical)
Emily A. Keram M.D.
(medical)
Kay Belschner
(medical)
Facts
On Dec. 5, 2009, the intoxicated plaintiff, Sean Kensinger, was driving in Eureka with two of his friends. Another motorist saw Plaintiff swerving on the highway and called 911 to report a drunk driver. California Highway Patrol Officer Jeffrey Goodwin arrested Plaintiff for driving under the influence of alcohol. Plaintiff and his companions were drunk and uncooperative during the encounter. CHP Officer Paul Craft, who had also responded to the incident, had to tase one of Plaintiff's friends in order to arrest him. At the jail, Plaintiff's two breathalyzer tests returned blood alcohol readings of .22 and .20.
Plaintiff sued Officers Craft and Goodwin, and their employer, the California Highway Patrol under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, for violating his 4th Amendment rights.
Plaintiff testified in his deposition that Officer Goodwin had not struck him, and Goodwin was dismissed on summary judgment. The CHP was dismissed on 11th Amendment grounds. The case went to trial against Officer Craft only.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that during his arrest Officer Craft struck him several times on the arm with his PR-24 police baton, injuring him.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense contended that no one struck Plaintiff.
Settlement Discussions
Just prior to trial, plaintiff demanded $75,000. Defendants made no offer.
Damages
Plaintiff claimed that the blows from Craft's baton resulted in tendonitis in his elbow. He also claimed severe emotional distress.
Result
Defense verdict.
Other Information
Defendants filed motions for recovery of attorneys' fees under 42 U.S.C. section 1988, and for sanctions against Plaintiff's attorneys under 28 U.S.C. section 1927, on the grounds that the action was unfounded and frivolous. EXPERT TESTIMONY: Defense expert Dr. Emily Keram testified that Plaintiff had a long-standing severe personality disorder characterized by paranoid delusions. Defense expert Dr. Kevin Harrington testified that the photos of his arm that Plaintiff claimed was taken two days after the incident actually showed injuries that were already one to three weeks old. FILING DATE: Feb. 24, 2011.
Deliberation
seven hours
Poll
8-0 (defense)
Length
five days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390