This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Air Pollution
Clean Air Act

Association of Irritated Residents v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa P. Jackson, in her official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. EPA, Laura Yoshi, in her official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for Region IX of the U.S. EPA

Published: Feb. 13, 2010 | Result Date: Dec. 22, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 4:09-CV-01890-CW Settlement –  Consent Decree

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alegria G. De La Cruz

Brent J. Newell


Defendant

Rochelle L. Russell


Facts

In April 2009, the Association of Irritated Residents (AIR), a group that promotes air quality and environmental health in the San Joaquin Valley, filed a citizen suit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). AIR sought to compel the EPA to take action on the Sept. 21, 2006 versions of San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Rules 2020 and 2201.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
AIR alleged that states are required to approve and present state implementation plans to the EPA for review according to Section 110(a)(1) of the CAA. These plans are designed to set forth control measures, which apply to specific sources of air pollution and must maintain National Ambient Air Quality Standards instituted by the EPA. AIR contended that the EPA was required to take action but failed to do so under Section 110 and as a result, the EPA negatively impacted public health, the permitting of agricultural station sources, and the progress of CAA citizen suits.

Damages

AIR requested a declaration that the EPA violated rules 2020 and 2201, an injunction, costs, attorney fees, and expert witness fees.

Result

The parties agreed to a consent decree whereby the EPA agreed to give notice of its final action on Rule 2020 and Rule 2201 by March 15, 2010.


#90713

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390