This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Constructive Fraud

Frank R. Lopez, individually and as Trustee to the Frank R. Lopez Living Trust, dtd Sept. 27, 2007 v. Wells Fargo Investments, LLC

Published: Feb. 20, 2010 | Result Date: Jan. 11, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 09-00877 Arbitration –  Respondent

Court

FINRA


Attorneys

Claimant

David S. Harrison
(Law Offices of David S. Harrison)


Respondent

G. Thomas Fleming III
(Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald LLP)

Kasumi Takahashi
(Jones Bell Abbott Fleming & Fitzgerald LLP)


Facts

Claimant Frank R. Lopez, an allegedly clinically blind elderly man of 91 years, initiated an arbitration proceeding with respondent Wells Fargo Investments seeking the losses sustained in his investment account as a result of the $500,000 purchase in 2008 of the preferred stocks issued by AIG, Wells Fargo, and "Fannie Mae."

Contentions

CLAIMANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Lopez claimed that he had been defrauded by his broker and that the preferred stocks were unsuitable for him. Lopez alleged wrongful conduct, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of written contract, constructive fraud, fraud by misrepresentation and omission, and failure to supervise. He also alleged violations of state and federal securities laws and NASD Rules of Fair Practice and NYSE Rules, as well as elder abuse.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Wells Fargo argued that in spite of Frank Lopez's advanced age, he made an intelligent and informed decision to invest in the preferred stocks. Wells Fargo also argued that the investments were suitable for Frank Lopez based on the information he provided to his broker concerning his financial condition and risk tolerance, and that any losses realized in his account were market driven and not recoverable as a matter of law.

Damages

Lopez sought at least $32,912 in general and compensatory damages, as well as lost opportunity costs, costs of proceedings, punitive damages, interest, attorney fees and costs, rescission of investment, and damages for elder abuse.

Result

The arbitrator denied Lopez's claims.


#90752

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390