Mary Smith, The Estate of Rodney Smith and Gillian Sickler v. Anthony Lucien Rose
Published: Feb. 27, 2010 | Result Date: Dec. 10, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: CIV467892 Verdict – Defense
Court
San Mateo Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
John P. Kristensen
(Carpenter & Zuckerman)
Defendant
Kevin K. Cholakian
(Cholakian & Associates)
Experts
Plaintiff
Mariusz Ziejewski
(technical)
Elliot D. Felman
(medical)
Kenneth Nemire Ph.D., C.PE
(technical)
Erich Horn
(medical)
Robert Lloyd Anderson
(technical)
Michael J. Stephenson
(technical)
Defendant
Rajeev Kelkar Ph.D.
(technical)
William H. Woodruff
(technical)
Alan C. Donelson
(medical)
Michael Reynard
(medical)
Douglas E. Young Ph.D.
(technical)
Facts
On May 25, 2007, Rodney Smith was riding a bicycle on Sand Hill Road when he collided with a vehicle driven by defendant Anthony Rose. Smith and Rose were both traveling eastbound on a windy part of the road, between Interstate 280 and Whiskey Hill Road. It was reported that Rose drifted into the bike lane and knocked Smith 50 to 60 feet. Smith died upon impact from a brain stem injury. Smith's widow and daughter sued Rose.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs alleged motor vehicle negligence and wrongful death. An accident reconstruction expert for the plaintiffs stated that the lack of skid marks indicated that Rose was not immediately aware of what had happened. He also stated that trajectory analysis showed that the vehicle was in the bike lane at the time of the incident. A biomechanics expert for the plaintiffs determined that the angle of the accident supported the theory that the vehicle turned into the bicycle, and not the other way around.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Rose contended that he did not turn or drift into the bike lane, and claimed that Smith made an unexpected U-turn from the lane into traffic, coming into the path of his car. Rose stated that he was going between 30 and 35 mph, when Smith suddenly looked over his left shoulder and turned into traffic, and that Rose had no time to react.
An accident reconstruction expert for the defense stated that the car's broken right headlight, along with the two large round dents in the front, right panel, in addition to damage to the bike, supported Rose's account of the event. Rose also contended that if Rose had hit Smith, the bike would have landed in the embankment, and not the pavement. Rose also argued that the lack of skid marks showed that the vehicle did not dramatically change direction. The report by the California Highway Patrol also supported Rose's claim, citing Smith with a vehicle code violation, and indicating the accident location was where Smith and his wife routinely made U-turns on their way home.
Damages
Smith's widow and daughter sought damages for wrongful death.
Injuries
Smith died as a result of the accident.
Result
The jury reached a verdict for the defense.
Deliberation
12 hours
Poll
9-3
Length
12 days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390