Charles Davis III v. City of Los Angeles
Published: Mar. 27, 2010 | Result Date: Dec. 7, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BC386864 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Cory M. Brente
(Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney)
Geoffrey R. Plowden
(Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney)
Experts
Plaintiff
Roger A. Clark
(technical)
Facts
On Nov. 10, 2006, Los Angeles Police Dept. Officers Machado, Estopin, Flores, Sieker, Smey, Doull, Joyce, Cole, Lopez, Valdez, and Navarro encountered plaintiff Charles Davis while investigating a disturbance. Davis sued the city of Los Angeles and the officers for excessive force and false arrest.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Davis contended that the officers arrived when he was standing on his property with his dog on a leash. He claimed that the officers clutched his arm, dragged him down his driveway, and pulled him to the ground. Next, he claimed, they hit him, kneed him, hauled him along the driveway, put him in handcuffs, used pepper-spray and a Taser on him, and put him under arrest absent any legal reason.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense rejected any allegations of misconduct.
Injuries
Davis suffered bruises and cuts on his chin, a fractured cheekbone, ear lacerations, and an asthma attack. He required stitches.
Result
The jury found in favor of the defense.
Other Information
FILING DATE: March 7, 2008.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390