This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Wrongful Death
Negligent Hiring, Retention and Training

Christine Villegas, a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Miguel Villegas, Ricezen Villegas, a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Miguel Villegas, Daniel Villegas, a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Miguel Villegas, Estate of Bernie Cervantes Villegas v. City of Anaheim, Anaheim Police Department, John Welter, Officer

Published: Dec. 13, 2014 | Result Date: Feb. 24, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 8:12-cv-02013-CJC-AN Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Francis X. Flynn

Adam L. Salamoff

Dana L. Douglas

Diana Lopez
(Weed Law Group, PC)

James F. Rumm

Federico C. Sayre
(Adamson Ahdoot LLP)


Defendant

Moses W. Johnson IV
(Office of the Anaheim City Attorney)

Cristina L. Talley
(Best Best & Krieger LLP)


Facts

Minors Christine Villegas, Ricezen Villegas, and Daniel Villegas, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Miguel Villegas, and the Estate of Bernie Villegas sued City of Anaheim, Anaheim Police Department, John Welter, and Doe Officers, in connection with Bernie Villegas' death.

Plaintiffs are the surviving minor children of the decedent.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that on Jan. 7, 2012, near midnight, their father was in the parking lot behind the apartment where he lived, talking with his friends when suddenly, SWAT officers surrounded them. The decedent had a BB gun, a present for his son, in his person at the time. Then, suddenly, and without warning, the SWAT officers that surrounded them, shot several rounds at the decedent, killing him. Plaintiffs alleged that the decedent never displayed the weapon or used the weapon on anyone, and that the officers did not give a warning prior to shooting.

Plaintiffs then sued defendants, and asserted claims for wrongful death, negligence, negligent hiring, retention and training, deprivation of civil rights under color of law, and deprivation of civil rights under color of law under Monell.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended they were responding to a report of a suspected drug dealer with a shotgun outside an apartment complex, when they encountered an individual holding a long-barrel gun. Defendants claimed that after decedent refused repeated commands to drop his weapon and then lifted the gun off the ground, defendant Officer Nick Bennallack fired five rounds at decedent, striking and killing him.

Bennallack claimed he had to make a split-second decision whether decedent was attempting to shoot him and the other police officers. Bennallack made the decision that decedent posed such a threat, so he shot decedent to protect himself and his fellow officers.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. As such, the district court issued a judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Nov. 19, 2012.


#90894

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390