This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Family and Medical Leave Act
Discrimination, Retaliation

Diane Thomas-Young v. Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center, and Does 1 through 100, inclusive

Published: Dec. 27, 2014 | Result Date: Jun. 17, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1:12-cv-01410-AWI-SKO Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jennet F. Zapata
(Dept of Water Resources)

Galen T. Shimoda
(Shimoda & Rodriguez Law PC)


Defendant

Caroline B. Burnett

Jahmal T. Davis
(Hanson Bridgett LLP)

Justin P. Rodriguez
(Shimoda & Rodriguez Law PC)


Facts

Diane Thomas-Young sued Sutter Central Valley Hospitals doing business as Memorial Medical Center

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that she worked for defendant as a Senior Philanthropic Advisor for Memorial Hospital Foundation. Plaintiff alleged that during her employment negotiations with defendant, defendant promised her a flexible schedule and generous compensation that was equal to or better than what she received from her prior employment. As a result of defendant's representations, plaintiff agreed to work for defendant. However, soon after starting her employment, defendant failed to keep its promises. She brought up the issue with management, but she was quickly rebuffed. Then, throughout her employment, defendant changed her schedule in contravention to the parties' agreement. For example, plaintiff alleged that defendant failed to pay her a yearly merit increase, as defendant had promised. Ultimately, defendant terminated her employment on July 22, 2010.

Plaintiff then sued asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory fraud, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, interference with the California Family Rights Act, interference with the Family and Medical Leave Act, discrimination/retaliation in violation of CFRA, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant moved for summary adjudication, arguing that it did not guarantee plaintiff a yearly merit pay increase, as plaintiff asserted.

Result

The court entered summary judgment in favor of the Hospital on Thomas-Young's claim for breach of contract on the issue of merit pay increases. It then granted the motion as to Thomas-Young's fraud-related and contract-related claims in its entirety. Accordingly, the court ordered the case closed.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 27, 2012.


#90971

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390