Gared Hansen v. City of San Francisco; Gregory P. Suhr, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Published: Jan. 17, 2015 | Result Date: Mar. 31, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:12-cv-04210-JST Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Elizabeth S. Salveson
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)
Dennis J. Herrera
(San Francisco Public Utilities Commission)
Lisa B. Berkowitz
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)
Facts
Gared Hansen filed a civil rights lawsuit against the City of San Francisco, Chief of Police Gregory Suhr, and former Chief of Police George Gascon.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that he was a police officer for the San Francisco Police Dept. and also practiced photography as a hobby. Plaintiff alleged that, in December 2009, Gascon suspended him for five days following an investigation into "the nature" of plaintiff's artwork, even though his art contained no indication of his employment as a police officer. Plaintiff further alleged that, in January 2012, he was suspended by Suhr for 10 days because an investigation into his personal website concluded that plaintiff's art brought discredit to the police department. Plaintiff contended that defendants' actions violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights to free expression.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that plaintiff's claims based on his December 2009 suspension were barred by the statute of limitations. Defendants also argued that plaintiff's claims against the city were barred because plaintiff's suspension was not made pursuant to an official policy. Defendants further argued that Suhr and Gascon were entitled to qualified immunity.
Result
The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. The court found, in part, that plaintiff's claims regarding the December 2009 suspension was barred by the statute of limitations. The court also found that the city was not liable for plaintiff's alleged claims because the city did not cause a constitutional violation through an official policy. The court further held that Gascon and Suhr were entitled to qualified immunity.
Other Information
FILING DATE: Aug. 9, 2012.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390