This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Age Discrimination
Wrongful Termination

Carol Benz v. The Clorox Company

Published: Jan. 31, 2015 | Result Date: Apr. 7, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:13-cv-01361-WHO Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dennis J. Woodruff


Defendant

Holly Gaudreau
(Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP)

Susan W. Pangborn
(Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP)


Facts

Carol Benz sued The Clorox Co., concerning an employment dispute.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that he began working for defendant in 2002, at the age of 52. Plaintiff contended that she excelled in her job, but defendant nevertheless terminated her and replaced her with a 33-year-old. Plaintiff alleged she was fired because of her age, and asserted claims for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Fair Employment and Housing Act.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued she was fired because she was not performing adequately. Defendant contended it had good cause for terminating plaintiff's employment, and moved for summary judgment.

Result

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Clorox.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 26, 2013.


#91077

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390