Carol Benz v. The Clorox Company
Published: Jan. 31, 2015 | Result Date: Apr. 7, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:13-cv-01361-WHO Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Holly Gaudreau
(Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP)
Susan W. Pangborn
(Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP)
Facts
Carol Benz sued The Clorox Co., concerning an employment dispute.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that he began working for defendant in 2002, at the age of 52. Plaintiff contended that she excelled in her job, but defendant nevertheless terminated her and replaced her with a 33-year-old. Plaintiff alleged she was fired because of her age, and asserted claims for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Fair Employment and Housing Act.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued she was fired because she was not performing adequately. Defendant contended it had good cause for terminating plaintiff's employment, and moved for summary judgment.
Result
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Clorox.
Other Information
FILING DATE: March 26, 2013.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390