This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Negligent Gate Maintenance

Cuauhtemoc Bolanos v. Falcon California Investments Inc., Zachary & Sons Inc., Shawn S. Zachary, and Does 1 through 50

Published: Jun. 29, 2013 | Result Date: Mar. 29, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC473180 Settlement –  $1,000,000

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Thomas A. Schultz
(Panish, Shea & Boyle LLP)

Andrew G. Owens JR.

Andrew L. Wright


Defendant

John B. McCarthy Jr.


Facts

A 600-pound iron security gate protected defendant's private property. The gate was allegedly negligently maintained because it failed to contain the proper gate stops and other safety measures intended to prevent the gate from falling over. While plaintiff was manually shutting the iron security gate, it suddenly collapsed onto plaintiff, causing severe crush injuries, resulting in multiple surgeries.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that the iron gate's collapse was clearly foreseeable and preventable. At one time, the gate was motorized. When the motor broke, defendant refused to repair it, thus requiring the gate to be manually closed each night. Plaintiff also alleged that defendant was aware that stoppers and other basic security features would have prevented its collapse.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant claimed that the accident never occurred because there were no third party witnesses to the accident, and the responding officer's accident report placed the scene of the accident at a similar property two blocks away from where it actually occurred. Assuming the accident occurred on defendant's property, defendant claimed that plaintiff's own negligence caused the gate to fall on him. Defendant further claimed that the amount and cost of all past treatment done on lien was excessive and unreasonable.

Injuries

Plaintiff suffered L3 compression fracture, meniscal tears in both knees, and torn should ligaments and tendons.

Result

The case settled for $1 million (policy limit).

Other Information

FILING DATE: Nov. 9, 2011.


#91486

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390