This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Pedestrian v. Auto
Wrongful Death

Estate of Doe Decedent v. Roe Doctor and Roe Medical Association

Published: Jun. 29, 2013 | Result Date: Apr. 9, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Settlement –  $3,100,000

Court

Case Not Filed


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Erika Contreras
(Panish, Shea, Boyle & Ravipudi LLP)

Tom Schultz
(Panish Shea Ravipudi LLP)

Brian J. Panish
(Panish, Shea, Boyle & Ravipudi LLP)


Facts

On June 30, 2012, plaintiffs' decedent, Jane Doe, 49 years old, was struck while standing next to her parked car. Plaintiffs claim Roe Doctor, who was on his way to work, was inattentive and veered into decedent's parking space striking decedent. Decedent succumbed to her injuries on July 4, 2012.

Decedent was survived by her two adult children, ages 24 and 28 years old, and her elderly parents, ages 84 and 79.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
At the time of the accident, Roe Doctor was driving his personal vehicle, which only had $100,000 in primary insurance coverage and an excess policy of $1,000,000. Plaintiffs contended Roe Doctor was acting in the course and scope of his employment for Roe Medical Clinic. Roe Doctor was a managing partner of the Medical Clinic who used his personal vehicle for the benefit of Roe Medical Clinic. As part of the partnership agreement, Roe Doctor was required to maintain a personal vehicle and, in exchange, received a vehicle stipend every month. As a result, plaintiffs contended Roe Medical Clinic's insurance of $ 2 million applied.

Roe Doctor initially claimed to the police officers that decedent walked into traffic and caused the accident. Roe Doctor, however, essentially admitted liability during his deposition when he was confronted with the accident scene photographs.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Roe Medical Clinic contended Roe Doctor was solely responsible for plaintiffs' damages. Because Roe Doctor was on his way to work at the time of the accident, the accident fell within the coming and going exclusion of the course and scope doctrine.

Injuries

Decedent was taken to the hospital where she was diagnosed with a severe traumatic brain injury and died of her injuries.

Result

Roe Doctor's $1.1 million personal policies were tendered soon after Roe Doctor's deposition was completed. The additional $2 million in insurance proceeds by the medical group were tendered shortly after the deposition of Roe Medical Clinic's vice president.


#91518

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390