This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Labor Law
Federal Labor Law
Distributed Handbill

Pacific Maritime Association and Eric Aldape, International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local No. 13, AFL–CIO

Published: Jul. 20, 2013 | Result Date: Sep. 14, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 21–CB–014966; 21-CA-039434 Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

NLRB


Attorneys

Respondent

Gillian B. Goldberg

Clifford D. Sethness
(Seyfarth Shaw)


Facts

The Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) are parties to a collective bargaining agreement called the Pacific Coast Longshore Contract Document (PCLCD). The PCLCD established the procedure to be used in the event that an employee complained of harassment or discrimination.

In 2009-2010, three employees filed grievances that they had been discriminated against and harassed by Eric Aldape as a result of flyers created by Aldape.

In two of the three cases, an arbitrator found that Aldape had violated the PCLCD. Adalpe subsequently filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board. The complaint alleged that the Union violated Section 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act through its involvement in the prosecution of the three grievances under the harassment and discrimination procedure, and that the employer violated Section 8(a)(1) by its actions in connection with one grievance.

Result

The Board adopted the administrative law judge's findings that the complaint should be dismissed. The Board found that with respect to the first grievance, the allegations were barred by the statute of limitations. With respect to the second grievance, the Board found that Aldape was not engaged in protected activity. As to the third, the Board found that the hearing alone was not a proper basis to impose unfair labor practice liability on the Respondents.


#91659

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390